UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:43 PDT

men Adams State 2
  
Adams State           
W-L: ( 0- 8) PR = 84.3868

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 313 A Dominican (CA) RMAC ( 2-10, 90.1) 13-23 315 A Concordia-Irvine RMAC ( 8- 7, 94.3) 2-19 328 H Dominican (CA) RMAC ( 2-10, 90.1) 8-13 330 H Concordia-Irvine RMAC ( 8- 7, 94.3) 1-23 403 A Colorado Mesa RMAC (13- 3, 96.5) 5-22 405 A Westminster (UT) RMAC ( 7- 7, 93.4) 3-18 409 H Colorado Mesa RMAC (13- 3, 96.5) 6-21 417 H Westminster (UT) RMAC ( 7- 7, 93.4) 5-18

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   313 A Dominican (CA)         13-23     -10    -6           0.00
   315 A Concordia-Irvine        2-19     -17   -11           0.00
   328 H Dominican (CA)          8-13      -5    -5           0.00
   330 H Concordia-Irvine        1-23     -22    -9           0.00
   403 A Colorado Mesa           5-22     -17   -13           0.00
   405 A Westminster (UT)        3-18     -15   -10           0.00
   409 H Colorado Mesa           6-21     -15   -12           0.00
   417 H Westminster (UT)        5-18     -13    -8           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Adams State Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adelphi Adelphi Adelphi   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Alabama-Huntsville Alabama-Huntsville   Alabama-Huntsville
American International American International   American International
Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Assumption Assumption   Assumption
Barton Barton   Barton
Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Bentley Bentley   Bentley
Bridgeport Bridgeport   Bridgeport
Caldwell Adams State   Adams State
Catawba Catawba   Catawba
Chestnut Hill Chestnut Hill   Chestnut Hill
Chowan Adams State   Adams State
Coker Coker   Coker
Colorado Mesa Colorado Mesa Colorado Mesa  
Concordia-Irvine Concordia-Irvine Concordia-Irvine  
D'Youville D'Youville   D'Youville
Davenport Davenport tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Davenport
Davis & Elkins Adams State   Adams State
District of Columbia Adams State   Adams State
Dominican (CA) Dominican (CA) Dominican (CA)  
Dominican (NY) Dominican (NY)   Dominican (NY)
Embry-Riddle Embry-Riddle   Embry-Riddle
Emmanuel (GA) Emmanuel (GA)   Emmanuel (GA)
Emory & Henry Adams State   Adams State
Felician Felician   Felician
Flagler Flagler insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Flagler
Florida Southern Florida Southern Florida Southern   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Florida Tech Florida Tech insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Florida Tech
Franklin Pierce Franklin Pierce   Franklin Pierce
Frostburg State Frostburg State   Frostburg State
Georgian Court Georgian Court   Georgian Court
Holy Family Holy Family   Holy Family
Indianapolis Indianapolis   Indianapolis
Lake Erie Lake Erie   Lake Erie
Lander Lander   Lander
Lees-McRae Lees-McRae   Lees-McRae
Lenoir-Rhyne Lenoir-Rhyne   Lenoir-Rhyne
Lewis Lewis insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Lewis
Limestone Limestone   Limestone
Lincoln Memorial Lincoln Memorial   Lincoln Memorial
Lynn Lynn insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Lynn
Malone Malone   Malone
Mars Hill Mars Hill   Mars Hill
Maryville Maryville   Maryville
Mercy Mercy   Mercy
Molloy Molloy   Molloy
Montevallo Montevallo   Montevallo
Mount Olive Mount Olive   Mount Olive
Newberry Newberry   Newberry
North Greenville North Greenville   North Greenville
Northwood Northwood   Northwood
Pace Pace   Pace
Palm Beach Atlantic Palm Beach Atlantic insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Palm Beach Atlantic
Post Post   Post
Quincy Quincy   Quincy
Roberts Wesleyan Roberts Wesleyan   Roberts Wesleyan
Rockhurst Rockhurst tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rockhurst
Rollins Rollins insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Rollins
Seton Hill Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Shorter Adams State   Adams State
Southern New Hampshire Southern New Hampshire   Southern New Hampshire
St Anselm St Anselm   St Anselm
St Leo St Leo insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) St Leo
St Michaels St Michaels   St Michaels
St Thomas Aquinas St Thomas Aquinas   St Thomas Aquinas
Tampa Tampa insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Tampa
Thomas More Adams State   Adams State
Tiffin Adams State   Adams State
Tusculum Tusculum   Tusculum
Virginia State Adams State   Adams State
Walsh Walsh   Walsh
Westminster (UT) Westminster (UT) Westminster (UT)  
Wheeling Wheeling   Wheeling
William Jewell William Jewell tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) William Jewell
Wilmington (DE) Wilmington (DE)   Wilmington (DE)
Wingate Wingate   Wingate
Young Harris Young Harris   Young Harris

PowerWise = 9


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 14.61

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Dominican (CA)  ( 2-10, 90.1)    13-23       -9.83      15.27       0.64         1.83           -16.77
   0 A Concordia-Irvi  ( 8- 7, 94.3)     2-19       -5.57      19.52       0.64         1.83            -9.00
   0 H Dominican (CA)  ( 2-10, 90.1)     8-13       -9.83      15.27      -0.64         1.83           -19.12
   0 H Concordia-Irvi  ( 8- 7, 94.3)     1-23       -5.57      19.52      -0.64         1.83           -11.35
   0 A Colorado Mesa   (13- 3, 96.5)     5-22       -3.36      21.73       0.64         1.83            -4.96
   0 A Westminster (U  ( 7- 7, 93.4)     3-18       -6.50      18.60       0.64         1.83           -10.69
   0 H Colorado Mesa   (13- 3, 96.5)     6-21       -3.36      21.73      -0.64         1.83            -7.31
   0 H Westminster (U  ( 7- 7, 93.4)     5-18       -6.50      18.60      -0.64         1.83           -13.04
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -92.24

winning pts = 0.0000 losing points = -92.2368

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------